Peer review recap part 4

This is going to be a slightly different post, because we all decided in my group that we were going to finish the peer review over the weekend.  Everyone is in the weeds with all of the work we have to do, and we wanted to make sure that we had the time to give good comments on everyone's papers.  

As far as the whole peer review process goes over the whole semester, I think I liked the format on Google Docs the best.  Sharing them on the EMU-Online site is also simple, but I didn't like the wiki as much.  It was ok for the rules, but it was hard to edit papers on there.  Maybe it's just because many of the tools weren't compatible with Safari.  Anyway, I had a relatively good experience with editing.  I mean, a lot of the time we didn't get our papers posted on time, but it all worked out.  

I think that peer review online was much more beneficial than in person, because (at least for me) I found that I was able to give more constructive criticism if I didn't have to say it directly to the person.  It seemed like others were able to do that as well, because I got more helpful comments than I usually do in a face-to-face environment.  I wish we did peer review this way in more of my classes:)